Originally published on CleanTechnica.
Update: An Atlanta EV expert has chimed in with numerous corrections to the Atlanta Business Chronicle (ABC) article. I’m adding that as an addendum. If you read any of the quotes from the ABC article, the addendum is a must-read.
Georgia is ranked #4 in the US in terms of electric car market share within the state. It is also the fastest-growing state in the US in electric car sales—239% growth in the last 9 months.
Atlanta is the #4 city market in the US for plug-in cars. In the last 5 months of 2013, Atlanta was the #1 Nissan Leaf market in the US, and it was #2 for the year as a whole*.
There are reasons for the strong sales in Atlanta, and Georgia as a whole. Let me run down a few:
- Atlanta has some of the worst air pollution in the US. The citizens and the government know that they need to clean their air up, and they know that electric cars are one of the best ways to do so.
- Atlanta is a very spread out city, which means people drive a lot. The more people drive, the more they save money if they switch from a gasmobile to an electric car.
- Of course, many citizens are also eager to fight global warming and cut their (and our country’s) reliance on oil. The pull of not having to visit gas stations anymore, or very seldomly (in the case of plug-in hybrid electric cars), is a strong one. However, you have to know that you have such an option before you’re going to buy an electric car, but the majority of the population doesn’t seem to be aware that electric cars are even on the market. In Atlanta and other top markets, the story is much different, since many people now see the cars on the street and even have friends, neighbors, or coworkers who own an electric car (most commonly, a Nissan Leaf).
- There’s also the fact that electric cars are simply a better drive—excellent acceleration, super quiet, and super smooth. Again, however, that’s not a selling point until it’s something people are aware of, which comes with market penetration.
- On top of the above, electric car drivers can use HOV lanes even with just one person in the car, a huge incentive in the traffic-clogged streets of the Atlanta metro area.
- The state of Georgia also offers a tax credit of up to $5,000 for anyone who purchases a “zero emission vehicle.”
That last one is certainly a strong incentive, and it goes on top of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. However, a bill put forth in the state by former Alpharetta Mayor Chuck Martin (R-Alpharetta) would eliminate that incentive if passed, and it would do so by April 1 of this year.
Martin actually drives a hybrid and says he supports electric vehicle growth, but he thinks the incentive has done its job and now it’s time to remove it. “We’ve accomplished our task, (EVs) are becoming mass-marketable, there are charging stations around the city and the state,” he said. “(EVs) are cost-competitive, and now it’s time for the business to make it on its own.”
Personally, I have to disagree. Until externalities (subsidies of a sort) caused by burning gas are not accounted for—as well as other oil subsidies—why remove support for electric cars? That would be rigging the system, creating an unbalanced playing field. (And let’s not even get into historical subsidies!)
Electric cars now account for 1.1% of the car market in Georgia. Word still needs to get out about the benefits of these cars, and incentives need to entice a lot more people.
In a recent article about the matter, Urvaksh Karkaria of the Atlanta Business Chronicle noted:
The Georgia EV tax credit applies not only to cars purchased, but also leased. That has led to situations where some EV drivers are able to drive for nearly free.
Consider this: Nissan offers a 36-month lease on a $28,800 LEAF S for $199 a month and $2,000 down.
The lessee can claim 15 percent of the $9,164 lease cost — $1,375 — in state income tax credits over five years. The leasing company gets the $7,500 federal tax credit, which it may pass on to the customer as “dealer discounts.”
[Important: see addendum regarding these numbers/facts.]
Good. This is what we need to spark a transition to electric cars. And it is working in Atlanta. Atlanta’s policies are perhaps the most effective in the nation for hastening this transition.
Martin thinks the Leaf is already competitive without the state subsidies.
The lawmaker doesn’t see the need for taxpayers to subsidize competitively priced and widely available technology. “I contend that the Nissan Leaf, priced at up to $32,000, is a price-competitive car — you don’t have a fuel cost, you don’t pay a gas tax because of that,” Martin said.
[Important: see addendum.]
I agree. But the car needs to be more than competitive in order to pull drivers to a new technology. This is how things go with new technology. People are hesitant to change and either need a push or a pull (or both).
If you don’t agree with Martin and think that Georgia needs to keep its EV tax credit, feel free to contact him and/or other members of the Georgia House of Representatives. Act on your civic rights and responsibilities. A healthy democracy is based on that!
Important Addendum by Don Francis, Coordinator of Clean Cities-Georgia and Executive Director of Partnership for Clean Transportation, Inc. (with minor edits for formatting & publishing):
Zachary, there are a couple of problems with the article in the Atlanta Business Journal. The $199 a month lease with $2000 down was for 24 months, not 36 months, which was greater due to reduced residual value at the end of 36 months. There were also taxes and fees which add to the total monthly payment. This lease was for the base S model of the LEAF and those [are] very few in number and do not represent the majority of the LEAFs either lease or sold in 2013. I just got a quote from a local dealer for a friend at $242 per month for 24 months for the S model. This does not include the cost of taxes and fees.
The other issue is the person leasing the vehicle, even for just 24 months, gets the entire $5000 (based on 20% of the cost of the vehicle capped at $5000) not the $1375 mentioned in the article. The unused portion of the tax credit can be rolled over for up to five years. In my case, I am capturing about $1500 each year (2011 and 2012) and therefore will take me four tax fillings to fully recover.
I also have issues with his statement: “I contend that the Nissan Leaf, priced at up to $32,000, is a price-competitive car — you don’t have a fuel cost, you don’t pay a gas tax because of that,”
The LEAF is comparable in size to the Nissan Versa, which retails for less than $20,000 even in its highest trim and option level configuration. Some LEAFs do pay $35 per year to the Georgia Highway User Fund if they opt for the Georgia AFV tag which is required for single-occupant access to the HOV lanes and free access to the HOT lanes as do most states. I am paying the $35 per year for my LEAF’s AFV tag, which is the equivalent buying 180 gallons of gas. This would be the same as I would pay if driving a gasoline vehicle with an average fuel economy of 33 miles per gallon. Drivers of Prius and other hybrid vehicles pay less in gasoline taxes than I do driving a LEAF. I assume he is contending that since I am paying less for electricity (about 1.5¢/mile) to drive my LEAF, I should be paying more for the privilege.
And finally, his legislation also removes the tax credit (10% capped at $2500) which applies to natural gas and propane fueled vehicles. Honda has made the Civic NG available in Atlanta and fleets are buying the natural gas and propane fueled GM and Ford pickups.
*Thanks to Don Francis, Coordinator of Clean Cities-Georgia, for these stats. And thanks to Beth Bond of Southeast Green for connecting Don and me.
Keep up to date with all the hottest electrified vehicle news here on CleanTechnica. Subscribe to our free EV newsletter or overall cleantech newsletter to never miss a story.
Top Image: Nissan Leafs in Barcelona, Spain. (CC BY-SA license, with the key requirement being that credit be given to Zachary Shahan / EV Obsession / CleanTechnica, and that those links not be removed.)
I think your first and third points should be moved to the bottom and the last point should be moved to the top. It’s not about being green, it’s about saving green. I know at least three people in ATL that bought a Leaf because the tax credits outweigh the cost of driving the EV.
“I am paying the $35 per year for my LEAF’s AFV tag, which is the equivalent buying 180 gallons of gas”. Where is this dude buying gas? And you get unlimited access to HOV lanes for the $35 too?
Bottom line is people are buying this car because it is subsidized. I will buy one primarily because it is subsidized. I like the idea of not buying gas, and think it is good for the environment (obviously not if you include the manufacturing process). That being said, I’m not smoking enough “green” to believe that global warming, or climate change, or whatever the press and Democrats will call it tomorrow, has been definitively as a risk to the earth’s future, that we need to blow up the world economy to mitigate it. The climate has changed continuously for billions of years. Giving politicians control of more pieces of the economy will not change that. Sorry.
By equivalent he means the taxes charged on 180 gallons of gas, not the full cost of the gas.
But of course people only buy these cars due to the subsidies. If that weren’t the case, we wouldn’t need the subsidies. It’s nonsensical to argue otherwise.
Just some odd wording. Think the point is that he has driven enough that he’d need 180 gallons of gas otherwise, but has only paid $35 for that electricity.
Some fine points here, but seems you’ve been misinformed massively about global warming, and also about the manufacturing footprint of a LEAF.
The benefits of a price on carbon outweigh the costs several times over.
Ask climate scientists, not people paid by fossil fuel industries.
Don’t think for a second this is like anything humanity has gone through before:
Or that CO2 isn’t the main cause (by far):
Regarding the LEAF & EVs being green:
A. Fossil fuel subsidies are miniscule compared to renewable fuel, and electric car subsidies. Especially on per unit of energy.
B. Record low temperatures aren’t evidence of global warming.
C. Given the first five bulleted advantages of electrics, why should we need the sixth?
B- Don’t recall mention of that in the article, but… last year was the 4th-hottest year on record, and would have been 2nd if not for El Nino.
But, hey, let’s point to record highs vs lows if that’s what you want to focus on:
C- Well, that was the point of much of the article. Should I copy & paste it down here?
A. The first article you linked indicated that renewables get 0.37 billion per year in subsidies. That’s laughable. Between all of the government backed loan failures, government funded research, and tax breaks, the amount is many times that. Add in 100,000. US electric car sales per year times the $7,500 federal tax credit (not including state subsidies) = $750,000,000.
B. That statement was in response to a prior comment.
C. That’s my point. If electric cars are so great, why should they require subsidies? The bullet points make them sound great and reasonably priced. The rest of the article merely makes the case for subsidies. They must not be so great.
You would think Georgia’s recent snowfall would give people a climate hint about whether to support EVs.
Indeed. That climate change–driven Polar Vortex was a bitch: