Dirty Energy & Fuel images-5

Published on September 7th, 2012 | by Don Lieber

12

Fracking and the Natural Gas "Boom" — No National Standards, Secrecy, and Carcinogens

Buffer this pageShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on LinkedInDigg thisEmail this to someone

September 7th, 2012 by

 
The President of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Francis Beinecke, recently visited areas in western Pennsylvania where ‘fracking’ operations are occurring, and spoke with local residents about the impacts of these projects in their communities. My cousin — a medical professional without any affiliation with environmental organizations like Ms. Beinecke’s — also spent time in these same areas recently, with family.

Both their stories convey a picture of dangerous and secretive industrialization in small-town America that most local residents fear and resent. And with good reason:

“In the past five years alone, ExxonMobil, Shell, and other energy companies have drilled more than 200,000 new wells across the United States,” said Beinecke.

That’s over 100 new wells… per day.
 

 
“…millions of gallons of wastewater laced with carcinogens are dumped in open-air reservoirs that can leak and contaminate drinking water. Some people living nearby say they suffer from migraines, dizziness, nausea, asthma, burning eyes, and fainting.”

Fracking involves the use of some of the most toxic and carcinogenic chemicals and pollutants used in any industry: benzene, toluene, methane, and many more. One highly sourced report, called “The Endorcrine Disruptor Exchange,” cited over 300 chemicals used in fracking, “many of which can cause cancer.” Yet — thanks to a waiver granted by the Bush administration known as the “Halliburton Loophole” — fracking is exempt from the Safe Drinking Water Act and other bedrock environmental measures.

As Ms. Beinkecke describes: “Only half the states where fracking occurs have even taken the simple step of requiring companies to disclose the chemicals they use in fracking fluid. And in eight of those states, companies can withhold any information they decide is confidential.” Thus, the powerful natural gas industry operates freely, despite the immense human health risks associated with the process.

And while gas industry executives insist — as did their predecessors in the tobacco and other industries in years past — that their industry is safe, the facts (like the chemicals they use) leak out eventually:

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection has confirmed methane from improperly constructed gas wells has contaminated people’s drinking water — and created a risk of fire or explosion in people’s homes and water wells. Duke University scientists recently confirmed “methane contamination in drinking water” in New York and Pennsylvania directly associated with nearby fracked wells. Officials in Wyoming have confirmed Benzene near fracked sites in Wyoming at levels far exceeding national safety standards. The list could go on much longer than the scope of this blog post. (See sources, below).

“Every single person we spoke with,” said Beinecke, “had stories of contaminated water and air.”

My cousin — whose name I am withholding because his family lives close to the operations in Pennsylvania — also observed what he described as an attempt to hide the effects of the process from the residents. “Some weird things (are) going on in the town of Wellsboro… every so often a contingent of security people show up in town at the main intersection for 12-24 hours and then disappear. The little quaint town now has tanker trucks streaming through 24/7. Some of the trucks have labels that say “fresh water” or “residual water,” with some of the trucks we saw with strips of duct tape partially covering the words “residual water.” (Waste water from fracking is “…so poisonous, when a gas company that legally doused a patch of West Virginia forest with salty wastewater from a drilling operation, it killed ground vegetation within days and more than half the trees within two years,” according to a report issued by Greenpeace USA.

“The NRDC is committed to changing this,” said Beinecke. “We are pushing for strong national safeguards for fracking, and helping empower local communities to restrict or ban dangerous fracking as they so choose. We want to ensure that reckless fracking operations no longer endanger people’s health and well being.”

Sources:

Keep up to date with all the most interesting green news on the planet by subscribing to our (free) Planetsave newsletter.




Buffer this pageShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on LinkedInDigg thisEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Don Lieber has written extensively on international human rights, war and disarmament, and climate justice. His writings have have been published by the United Nations, The Associated Press, The International Campaign to Ban Landmines, The Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, DeSmog Blog, E-The Environmental Magazine, and others. He is a frequent contributor to PlanetSave. When not writing about climate change, he plays bass for the NYC-based band "Wifey".



  • Julian Cox

    Welcome to the wellhead of the “clean” hydrogen fuel cell economy. Nice.

  • Julian Cox

    Welcome to the wellhead of the “clean” hydrogen fuel cell economy. Nice.

  • Sherrie Pasarell

    Fracking is exempt from the Safe Drinking Water Act (and other bedrock environmental measures) ?? In logic world, we’re all saying “how can that be?”– until we realize that the wording of the at, and any other document, may be crafted in a way wherein the concept of safe drinking water is probably somehow conditional.

    i have not yet accessed any of those links above, but I think that very experience speaks to one of the most significant dangers here: Most, if not all folks these days are so manically busy, we are unlikely to follow up the most critical things-even, most sadly, things critical to out kids & future generations.

    It’s our job to give the next generation/s the best, most livable home.
    The greedy pigs who have reduced that prospect considerably -YEAH, it’s THEIR FAULT( props to HalliburtonCheney etc), and we’re stuck with the responsibility to lessen the damage as much as possible.

    And it’s galling that the bad guys don’t seem to pay any price.
    Where’s the justice.

    • Sherrie Pasarell

      Not as galling as the issue here, but:
      In my post above, I see some kind of auto”correct” set in after I sent.
      -This, after I proof- read and allowed a few seconds before posting!

Back to Top ↑