Climate Change

Published on July 6th, 2012 | by James Ayre

4

Aerosols From Small Volcanic Eruptions Can Influence Global Climate

Buffer this pageShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on LinkedInDigg thisEmail this to someone

July 6th, 2012 by

 
20120705-174557.jpg

An international team of researchers has just discovered that aerosols even from comparatively small volcanic eruptions can make it into the high atmosphere when assisted by weather systems such as monsoons. Once in the high atmosphere, aerosols are capable of affecting global temperatures for a short time. If they don’t make into into the high atmosphere, like the aerosols from most small eruptions don’t, then they can’t affect the global climate.

Until this discovery it had been thought that only a massively energetic eruption was capable of injecting aerosols “past the troposphere, the turbulent atmospheric layer closest to Earth, into the stable layers of the stratosphere higher up.”

“If an aerosol is in the lower atmosphere, it’s affected by the weather and it precipitates back down right away,” said Adam Bourassa, the lead researcher from the University of Saskatchewan’s Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies. “Once it reaches the stratosphere, it can persist for years, and with that kind of a sustained lifetime, it can really have a lasting effect.” The effect that he is referring to is the potential cooling of the Earth’s surface caused by the incoming sunlight being scattered.

20120705-174818.jpg
As an example, the enormous eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991 dropped temperatures by half a degree Celsius world-wide temporarily.

The researchers analyzed the June 2011 eruption of the Nabro volcano in Eritrea in northeast Africa. “Wind carried the volcanic gas and aerosol — minute droplets of sulfuric acid — into the path of the annual Asian summer monsoon.”

“The stratosphere’s calm layers are high — from 10 km up at the poles to 17 km altitude at the equator — and it was thought storms could not pierce it. For example, the distinctive flattened ‘anvil’ shape at the top of large thunderstorms is created as the storm pushes against the stratosphere.”

“Dust from the Nabro volcano, being slightly heavier, settled out, but the monsoon lofted volcanic gas and the lighter liquid droplets into the stratosphere where they were detected by the Canadian Space Agency’s OSIRIS instrument aboard the Swedish satellite Odin. The Nabro volcano caused the largest stratospheric aerosol load ever recorded by OSIRIS in its more than 10 years of flight.”

OSIRIS was developed to study the upper atmosphere, especially the ozone layer and atmospheric aerosols. Though it was originally intended as a two-year mission, the instrument has been functioning perfectly since its launch back in 2001. It circles around the Earth from North Pole to South Pole once every hour and a half, continually giving new data to the analysis centre at the U of S campus.

“There are only a few instruments that can measure stratospheric aerosols, and OSIRIS is one of them,” Bourassa says. “It’s become extremely important for climate studies, because we’ve captured more than a full decade of data. The longer it’s up, the more valuable it becomes.”

The researchers hope that these findings will help in the refinement of climate models, allowing for the development of models even more accurate than the ones used now.

 

 

The research team included scientists from the U of S, Rutgers University in New Jersey, the National Centre for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, and the University of Wyoming. The funding was provided by NSERC, the Canadian Space Agency, and the U.S. National Science Foundation, with support from the NASA Aura Science Team.

The research appears in the July 6 issue of the journal Science.

Source: University of Saskatchewan
Image Credits: NASA Earth Observatory image by Robert Simmon, using EO-1 ALI data; NASA Earth Observatory; NOAA

Keep up to date with all the most interesting green news on the planet by subscribing to our (free) Planetsave newsletter.




Buffer this pageShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on LinkedInDigg thisEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy. You can follow his work on Google+.



  • Ron

    What a shock – the so-called scientists have been wrong about volcanic eruptions – but it’s worse than just being wrong – they simply have no idea how wrong, as this discovery throws out all their nice, preconceived, prepacked, climate models (yet again). Maybe this is just one of the reasons why the Earth hasn’t warmed over the last decade despite the rise in CO2 as all the models were predicting…

    And yet we still have nitwits tell us the “science is settled”. Oh my. What hubris. What folly…

    • http://zacharyshahan.com Zachary Shahan

      Ron, I think you’re off your rocker.. or getting a little too excited about a little thing.

      From the post above: “Once in the high atmosphere, aerosols are capable of affecting global temperatures for a short time. If they don’t make into into the high atmosphere, like the aerosols from most small eruptions don’t, then they can’t affect the global climate.”

      This is a very minor finding, and it doesn’t throw the consensus out of wack at all. This is a very minor factor. I’d recommend this post for putting this in more context: http://planetsave.com/2012/01/19/what-is-causing-global-warming/

      As far as your other comment, “For global records, 2010 is the hottest year on record, tied with 2005.”: http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998-basic.htm

      “The globally-averaged temperature for May 2012 marked the second warmest May since record keeping began in 1880. May 2012 also marks the 36th consecutive May and 327th consecutive month with a global temperature above the 20th century average.”: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/

      Not even the oil companies would agree with your statement about warming stopping. Doesn’t that give you a clue that you’re out of touch with the scientific consensus?

  • Rick Haberman

    Don’t tell me you are honestly just realizing this now?! Are you really that dumb, or do you just think we are?

    • http://zacharyshahan.com Zachary Shahan

      Rick, I’m not sure if you actually read the article. It’s not about the capability of aerosols to affect climate. It’s about the capability of short-lived aerosols from small eruptions to reach the high atmosphere. Science is about testing things and confirming them. Aerosols from small eruptions generally don’t reach the high atmosphere (so, not such an odd assumption) but they can with the assistance of strong weather patterns. Of course, you knew all about this beforehand, though…

Back to Top ↑