Dirty Energy & Fuel Copenhagen's Green Power Island (conceptual)

Published on August 5th, 2010 | by Tom Schueneman

8

Green Power Island: A Vision for Renewable Energy Storage

August 5th, 2010 by

Copenhagen's Green Power Island (conceptual)

Are energy storage islands the green solution we need?

Denmark is a windy place. Windy enough to provide 20 percent of the country’s power generation from both onshore and offshore wind farms. As growth in wind power continues, the problem of large-scale energy storage from wind becomes an increasing challenge.

With a focus on the abundant wind energy in Denmark and an understanding of the challenge, Copenhagen-based architectural firm Gottlieb Paludan has proposed an innovative design for energy storage called Green Power Island.

While the design for Green Power Island is new, the fundamental concept behind it isn’t, using pumped hydro to store renewable energy – an idea already in wide use. Conventional pumped hydro systems use vertically separated reservoirs to utilize the power of water and gravity. During low demand water is pumped using excess energy from the lower to the upper reservoir. As demand increases, the water is allowed to flow downhill into the lower reservoir, generating electricity in the process.

The system is limited by the amount of water that can be stored and the height difference between the two reservoirs. Gottlieb Paludan takes the idea and gives it a unique “Danish twist.” Green Power Island proposes using seawater pumped into a lagoon-like reservoir built into an artificial island. When demand is low, pumps driven by wind turbines empties the reservoir. At peak periods, water is allowed to flow back into the reservoir, through turbines generating electricity to meet the rising demand.

Wind energy pumps out seawater during low demand. As demand rises, water is allowed into the reservoir to drive turbines to meet the demand.

Green Power Island - Tampa, FloridaWith plans already drawn for several locales, including Copenhagen, Bahrain, Jiangsu, and Tampa, Florida, each island is designed to enhance the surrounding environment and utilize the space with mixed used capabilities. Built primarily around storage of wind energy, the islands can also include PV and concentrated solar, and even biomass production. Many islands also have plans for recreation trails, beaches, harbors,  even residential and business units.

How green is that island?

Are there substantial engineering and environmental concerns with the Green Power Island concept? As one ex-governor might say, you betcha. Issues that Sten Sedring, communications officer for Gottlieb Paludan, readily acknowledges. Concerns of the impact on the seabed and surrounding habitat chief among them. Nonetheless, it does provide a means of utility scale renewable energy production and storage near demand centers (no need for long distance transmission lines), and Sedring argues that with mixed-used planning as a key feature, Green Power Islands could enhance their surroundings in a variety of ways beyond just power production.

It beats climate negotiations (business as usual)…

I first learned of Green Power Island last December while playing hooky for a day from the COP15 climate conference in Copenhagen. Given the choice of spending another day watching the bitter, log-jammed negotiations unfold at the Bella Center, I opted instead of joining a small band of journalists for a press trip highlighting Danish innovation. It was a refreshing change of pace.

There are no doubt significant hurdles to overcome before Green Power Island could ever become reality. Some might say that even if it were possible, it would be little more than a huge manmade offshore monstrosity. To those I would suggest, consider the options. We are digging deep into the ocean’s depths, wringing tar from sand, blowing the tops off of mountains – all for one more drop of oil, one more lump of coal. To most of us, this environmental destruction is largely out of sight, out of mind. That is, until disaster strikes, as surely it does, and surely it will.

We find ourselves at a time when we desperately need solutions, business as usual won’t cut it anymore. If there is one certainty, it is that the world we live in will look very different 50 years from now than it does now – one way or another.

Whether Green Power Island becomes a viable solution or not, it is at least an idea, a sincere attempt at a solution and a vision for how our world might look in future. It could be worse.

Keep up to date with all the most interesting green news on the planet by subscribing to our (free) Planetsave newsletter.





Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

is an online publisher, editor, and freelance writer. He is the founder of GlobalWarmingisReal.com and the History Blog Project, as well as publisher and site director for the HippieMagazine.com. Tom also contributes to numerous environmental blogs, including TriplePundit, Ecopolitology, Sustainablog, and Planetsave.   Tom's work has led him to Europe, Africa, Latin America, Canada, the South Pacific, and across the United States. His home base is San Francisco, California.



  • Pingback: Gravity Power Module: Turning Conventional Pumped Hydro on It’s Head – Planetsave

  • http://Web Uncle B

    The evolution of battery cars, as oil prices itself off the market will provide some ballast for Solar, Wave, wind, Hydro, Tidal , Geothermal and Nuclear electric sources.
    Thorium reactors will rumble along at a constant output and need battery car storage to flatten peak demand and better distribute outputs, much as Wind Turbines require storage for power use when humanity requires it.
    Pumping of water, although primitive may prove economical and work effectively.
    I picture folks with swimming pools filled with lead/acid batteries trying to gain by charging in off peak times, and using power when desired?
    If our lives were pulsed by the availability of Solar power, we would be much healthier animals.
    If society were designed around the human being and not the corporate factory interests, power generation by Solar would be preferred.
    Ask off-griders for the final definitive answer – we will all be off griders in the end, Corporatism is failing miserably to provide for the American people, and we must not pervert ourselves to fit their ways as they fade,but reach out to a new formula for the future – an electric future, with Solar, Wind Wave, Hydro, Tidal, geothermal, and Nuclear power replacing the diminishing oil we now depend upon.

  • Pingback: Man Made Islands May Be Wind Power Key | EarthTechling

  • Tom

    Point taken, Susan, though perhaps more with the word “problem” than “challenge”.
    To use your analogy, while perhaps people didn’t characterize building the railroad in the 19th century a “problem” (though we can’t really say the “nobody” called it that – I’d say most would have seen before them some significant challenges – an then acted accordingly. To say we are not faced now with significant challenges – including that of renewable energy storage – is not facing the reality, as well as the opportunity, before us. And until we do that, little progress can be made.

  • Pingback: Green Power Islands Store Clean Energy From the Wind and Sun | Inhabitat - Green Design Will Save the World

  • Pingback: B1 with Earth » Blog Archive » News: Green Power Island – A renewable energy haven for Denmark

  • Susan

    Wonderful idea. But let's not call renewable storage a "challenge" or a "problem".

    There's lots of great ideas for storage out there (CAES, distributed Vinalhaven Steffes units etc), and it is part of renewables, in just the same way that when we developed coal in the 19th century to fire up steam engines for electricity we had to have the railroad to truck it across country. Nobody called the invention of the railroad a "problem."

    Each energy source has accompanying technology needed to make it work. these are not "challenges" "obstacles" or "impediments" – they are more opportunities that help others put bread and butter on the table and help bring about the new green economy.

    • Zach

      great point. thanks for adding this, Susan!

Back to Top ↑