Science huber-future

Published on May 5th, 2010 | by Joshua S Hill

21

Future Temperatures Could Exceed Human Livability

May 5th, 2010 by

All the focus on reducing climate change is based on what will happen this century, but what happens the century after if we fail?

According to new research findings, reasonable worse-cast scenarios for global warming if rising greenhouse gas emissions are not stamped out immediately could see Earth’s temperature exceed that which humans can tolerate in coming centuries.

global warming threat

Steven Sherwood, professor at the Climate Change research Centre at the University of New South Wales, and Matthew Huber, professor of earth and atmospheric science at Purdue University, will publish their findings in the May 6 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Their research shows for the first time the highest tolerable “wet-bulb” temperature that humans can withstand and the fact that this temperature could be exceeded for the first time in human history if greenhouse gas emissions continue at their current rate of increase. The research shows that humans and most mammals will suffer a likely lethal level of heat stress at wet-bulb temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit if sustained for six hours or more.

What is Wet-Bulb Temperature?

A wet-bulb temperature is a measurement of temperature that describes the lowest temperature that can be reached by the evaporation of water only. It is the equivalent to what is felt when wet skin is exposed to moving air and includes temperature and atmospheric humidity. The temperature is found by covering a standard temperature bulb with a wetted cloth and fully ventilating it.

“The wet-bulb limit is basically the point at which one would overheat even if they were naked in the shade, soaking wet and standing in front of a large fan,” said Sherwood. “Although we are very unlikely to reach such temperatures this century, they could happen in the next.”

The wet-bulb temperature estimates offer the upper limits on the ability of the human body to cool itself by sweating or other means. In order for the heat dissipation process to work effectively the surrounding air must be cooler than the skin, which itself must be cooler than the core body temperature. If the wet-bulb temperature is warmer than the skin temperature, metabolic heat cannot be released and can lead to potentially dangerous overheating depending on the magnitude and duration of the heat stress.

“Although areas of the world regularly see temperatures above 100 degrees, really high wet-bulb temperatures are rare,” said Huber. “This is because the hottest areas normally have low humidity, like the ‘dry heat’ referred to in Arizona. When it is dry, we are able to cool our bodies through perspiration and can remain fairly comfortable. The highest wet-bulb temperatures ever recorded were in places like Saudi Arabia near the coast where winds occasionally bring extremely hot, humid ocean air over hot land leading to unbearably stifling conditions, which fortunately are short-lived today.”

“Whole countries would intermittently be subject to severe heat stress requiring large-scale adaptation efforts,” Huber said. “One can imagine that such efforts, for example the wider adoption of air conditioning, would cause the power requirements to soar, and the affordability of such approaches is in question for much of the Third World that would bear the brunt of these impacts. In addition, the livestock on which we rely would still be exposed, and it would make any form of outside work hazardous.”

Future Global Warming and Wet-Bulb Temperature Limits

Sherwood and Huber’s work related to possible future warming beyond the end of the 21st century. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has estimated that warming by the end of this century could reach seven degrees Fahrenheit, Huber believes that an eventual warming of 25 degrees is feasible.

“We found that a warming of 12 degrees Fahrenheit would cause some areas of the world to surpass the wet-bulb temperature limit, and a 21-degree warming would put half of the world’s population in an uninhabitable environment,” Huber said. “When it comes to evaluating the risk of carbon emissions, such worst-case scenarios need to be taken into account. It’s the difference between a game of roulette and playing Russian roulette with a pistol. Sometimes the stakes are too high, even if there is only a small chance of losing.”

The National Science Foundation-funded research investigated the long-term implications of sustained greenhouse gas emissions on climate extremes. The team used climate models to compare the peak wet-bulb temperatures to the global temperatures for various climate simulations and found that the peak wet-bulb temperature rises approximately 1 degree Centigrade for every degree Centigrade increase in tropical mean temperature.

Source: Purdue University
Image Sources: Global warming map via Purdue University; Faucet in sand via Shutterstock

Keep up to date with all the most interesting green news on the planet by subscribing to our (free) Planetsave newsletter.




Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, a liberal left-winger, and believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I work as Associate Editor for the Important Media Network and write for CleanTechnica and Planetsave. I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), Amazing Stories, the Stabley Times and Medium.   I love words with a passion, both creating them and reading them.



  • Stanley

    I suggest we return to the 5 day work week no business other then hospitals,cops and power plants should be working 7 day weeks. Shut down the quick mart shut down all manufacturing what there is left in the US.

  • Edward Kirby

    The amount of carbon in the methane that could be released in one ‘burp’ (the so-called “clathrate gun”) is something like 4X the amount released by humans since the Industrial Age began. This hypothetical burp could be so powerful that it causes tsunamis.

    Just a heads up there from your friend Ed. :-D

  • Scott

    It’s also feasible that the temperatures will average lower, remain the same, or go up 50 degrees by the end of the century! Keep in mind that the earth is still recovering from an ice age. Prior to this, and there is tons of evidence that supports this, we had a much warmer earth. Mammoths traversed what is now called the frozen tundra, mountain tops in Australia once support “rain forest” conditions! Please consider the past and the extreme complexity of nature (solar activity, volcanic activity, etc) when attempting to predict the future when it comes to weather and temperature predictions. The future is bright and mankind is adaptive!

  • Pingback: Starbucks, Nike, eBay, Adidas, IKEA: “We Cannot Risk Our Kids’ Futures On The False Hope The Vast Majority Of Scientists Are Wrong” | CleanTechnica

  • Cynical Bastard

    Bah, by that time we will have reached the level of technology where we can sustain ourselves indoors completely. Giant effing domes people.

    • Edward Kirby

      Wouldn’t it be easier and cheaper just to cut our carbon emissions now?

      • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

        Yes… :D

  • Cynical Bastard

    Bah, by that time we will have reached the level of technology where we can sustain ourselves indoors completely. Giant effing domes people.

    • Edward Kirby

      Wouldn’t it be easier and cheaper just to cut our carbon emissions now?

      • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

        Yes… :D

      • Bongstar420

        LFTR!

  • Naguib

    can u exactly tell me that will winter be extinct after 2020? if winter gets extinct, then how will we be able to cool down ourselves? so in south asian countries there will be summer the entire year? no more winters? and yes, future will be a hell. i think in future we have to turn on the air conditioner for 24 hours a day and it would cost us a hefty bill. i guess this is the symptom of the judgement day. it seems that the world will end quickly.

  • Pingback: Where My Taxes Went

  • Pingback: UN Climate Negotiators Wrestle for an ‘Ideal’ Plan that Will Completely Screw Us

  • Pingback: Polar Cities — the Ultimate in Long-Term Real Estate Speculation?

  • Pingback: Get Involved in Politics.. Hear Me Out (Going Green Tip #14) | Planetsave

  • Pingback: Full Global Warming Solution: How to Stabilize World Climate – Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news

  • Pingback: Obama & White House Mute on Climate Change – Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news

  • Brad Arnold

    Here is what Climate Code Red says:

    –Human emissions have so far produced a global average temperature increase of 0.8 degree C.

    –There is another 0.6 degree C. to come due to “thermal inertia”, or lags in the system, taking the total long-term global warming induced by human emissions so far to 1.4 degree C.

    –If human total emissions continue as they are to 2030 (and don’t increase 60% as projected) this would likely add more than 0.4 degrees C. to the system in the next two decades, taking the long-term effect by 2030 to at least 1.7 degrees C. (A 0.3 degree C. increase is predicted for the period 2004-2014 alone by Smith, Cusack et al, 2007).

    –Then add the 0.3 degree C. albedo flip effect from the now imminent loss of the Arctic sea ice, and the rise in the system by 2030 is at least 2 degree. C, assuming very optimistically that emissions don’t increase at all above their present annual rate! When we consider the potential permafrost releases and the effect of carbon sinks losing capacity, we are on the road to a hellish future, not for what we will do, but WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY DONE.

    “The alternative (to geoengineering) is the acceptance of a massive natural cull of humanity and a return to an Earth that freely regulates itself but in the hot state.” –Dr James Lovelock, August 2008

    • Edward Kirby

      The amount of carbon in the methane that could be released in one ‘burp’ (the so-called “clathrate gun”) is something like 4X the amount released by humans since the Industrial Age began. This hypothetical burp could be so powerful that it causes tsunamis.

      Just a heads up there from your friend Ed. :-D

  • Pingback: Future Temperatures Could Exceed Human Livability « Earth Environment Underground

Back to Top ↑