{"id":26923,"date":"2011-12-05T17:43:46","date_gmt":"2011-12-05T22:43:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/planetsave.com\/?p=26923"},"modified":"2011-12-05T17:43:46","modified_gmt":"2011-12-05T22:43:46","slug":"romney-gingrich-two-climate-change-flip-floppers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/planetsave.com\/articles\/romney-gingrich-two-climate-change-flip-floppers\/","title":{"rendered":"Romney & Gingrich: Two Climate Change Flip-Floppers"},"content":{"rendered":"

 <\/p>\n

\"romney<\/a><\/p>\n

What causes a politician to accept the science of a given topic (for example, climate change) and then change their mind abuot it years later, after the science and the scientific consensus gets even stronger?<\/p>\n

Is it as simple as agreeing with everything that comes out of the mouth of the people who fund you? Is it a fear of not getting elected by your base constituency (illogically, according to\u00a0polls<\/a>\u00a0on the issue)? Is it a genuine misunderstanding of the state of the science?<\/p>\n

I don’t know, but Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich must.<\/p>\n

Mitt Romney & Climate Change<\/h1>\n