Type 1a supernovae have previously been used for measuring cosmic distance because of their brightness, allowing them to be seen across the Universe and have roughly the same luminosity everywhere. There have been many theories about the sorts of stars that cause these explosions, but until now no one has ever directly seen one.
In new research, the first-ever direct observations of a Type 1a supernova progenitor system have occurred. “Astronomers have collected evidence indicating that the progenitor system of a Type 1a supernova, called PTF 11kx, contains a red giant star. They also show that the system previously underwent at least one much smaller nova eruption before it ended its life in a destructive supernova. The system is located 600 million light years away in the constellation Lynx.”
For a comparison, indirect observations of a different Type 1a supernova progenitor system (SN 2011fe) turned up no evidence of a red giant star. When combined, these observations imply that just because Type 1a supernovae appear the same, it doesn’t mean that they are created the same way.
“We know that Type 1a supernovae vary slightly from galaxy to galaxy, and we’ve been calibrating for that, but this PTF 11kx observation is providing the first explanation of why this happens,” says Peter Nugent, a senior scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and a co-author on the paper. “This discovery gives us an opportunity to refine and improve the accuracy of our cosmic measurements.”
“It’s a total surprise to find that thermonuclear supernovae, which all seem so similar, come from different kinds of stars,” says Andy Howell, a staff scientist at the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network (LCOGT) and a co-author on the paper. “How could these events look so similar, if they had different origins?”
“You maybe find one of these systems in a sample of 1,000 Type 1a supernovae,” he says. “The Palomar Transient Factory Real-Time Detection Pipeline was crucial to finding PTF 11kx.”
“The PTF survey uses a robotic telescope mounted on the 48-inch Samuel Oschin Telescope at Palomar Observatory in southern California to scan the sky nightly. As the observations are taken, the data travels more than 400 miles via high-speed networks-including the National Science Foundation’s High Performance Wireless Research and Education Network and the Department of Energy’s Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)-to the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), located at Berkeley Lab.”
“There, the Real-time Transient Detection Pipeline uses supercomputers, a high-speed parallel filesystem and sophisticated machine learning algorithms to sift the data and identify events for scientists to follow up on.”
“According to Nugent, the pipeline detected the supernova on January 16, 2011. He and UC Berkeley postdoctoral researcher Jeffrey Silverman immediately followed up on the event with spectroscopy observations from the Shane telescope at the University of California’s Lick Observatory. These observations revealed incredibly strong calcium signals in the gas and dust surrounding the supernova, which is extremely unusual.”
“The signals were so peculiar that Nugent and his UC Berkeley colleagues, Alex Filippenko and Joshua Bloom, triggered a Target of Opportunity (ToO) observation using the Keck Telescope in Hawaii. “We basically called up a fellow UC observer and interrupted their observations in order to get time critical spectra,” Nugent explains.”
“From the Keck observations, astronomers noticed that the clouds of gas and dust surrounding PTF 11kx were moving too slowly to be coming from the recent supernova, but moving too quickly to be stellar wind. They suspected that maybe the star erupted, or went nova, previously propelling a shell of material outwards. The material, they surmised, must be slowing down as it collided with wind from a nearby red giant star. But for this theory to be true, the material from the recent supernova should eventually catch up and collide with gas and dust from the previous nova. That’s exactly what the PTF team eventually observed.”
“In the months following the supernova, the PTF team watched the calcium signal drop and eventually vanish. Then, 58 days after the supernova went off, Berkeley Lab Scientist Nao Suzuki who was observing the system with the Lick telescope noticed a sudden, strong burst in calcium coming from the system, indicating that the new supernova material had finally collided with the old material.”
“This was the most exciting supernova I’ve ever studied. For several months, almost every new observation showed something we’d never seen before,” says Ben Dilday, a UC Santa Barbra postdoctoral researchers and lead author of the study.
“According to Dilday, it is not unusual for a star to undergo nova eruptions more than once. In fact, a ‘recurrent nova’ system called RS Ophiuchi exists within our own Milky Way Galaxy. Located about 5,000 light years away, the system is close enough that astronomers can tell that it consists of a compact white dwarf star (the corpse of a sun-like star) orbiting a red giant. Material being blown off the red giant star in a stellar wind lands on the white dwarf. As the material builds up, the white dwarf periodically explodes, or novas, in this case, about every 20 years.”
“Astronomers predict that in recurring novas, the white dwarf loses more mass in the nova eruption than it gains from the red giant. Because Type 1a supernovae occur in systems where a white dwarf accretes mass from a nearby star until it can’t grow any further and explodes, many scientists concluded that recurrent nova systems could not produce Type 1a supernovae.”
“They thought the white dwarf would lose too much mass to ever become a supernova. PTF 11kx is the first observational evidence that Type 1a supernovae can occur in these systems.”
“Because we’ve looked at thousands of systems and PTF 11kx is the only one that we’ve found that looks exactly like this, we think it is probably a rare phenomenon. However, these systems could be somewhat more common, and nature is just hiding their signatures from us,” says Silverman.
Image Credits: DOE/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; BJ Fulton, Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network