Billions of Fish and a Nuclear Power Plant to Face off in the Supreme Court
Environmentalists across the nation argue that too many fish get sucked up and killed in the cooling systems of nuclear power plants each year.
As the presidential election draws near, Americans will be voting on a number of key issues, among the most important, I think we all agree, is energy. Will we choose John McCain, the nuclear candidate, or Barack Obama, the wind, solar, and fuel-efficient car candidate?
One issue that ties in to this debate: the significant loss of lake, river & marine life that gets sucked into the cooling systems of many older nuclear power plants, battered against the sides of pipes, and heated to death by steam.
This term the Supreme Court is expected to vote regarding the future of Indian Point, a nuclear power plant in the suburbs north of New York City. Environmentalists claim that Indian Point, and power plants around the country, are killing billions of fish and fish eggs unnecessarily, with their cooling systems.
Energy-industry officials say that people opposed to nuclear power are stretching the truth a bit.
Everyone is watching the upcoming Supreme Court Decision at Indian Point carefully, as it will probably influence similar decisions in years to come.
Over 1,000 power plants and factories around the United States use water from rivers, lakes, oceans and creeks as a coolant. The Indian Point plant in New York can pull in 1.7 million gallons of water per minute. Nineteen plants on or near the California coast use 16.3 billion gallons of sea water every day. Along with all this water, come fish and other marine life.
Right now at Indian Point there is already a 1/4 inch net system in place that keeps out larger fish, though these nets are criticized for catching and killing fish as well.
In the end it comes down to money, as the proper technology indeed exists to keep the fish out of the system.
The fish-safe, alternative technology are called Cooling towers. These towers allow water entering into the plant to be recycled, rather than the plant continuously pumping in new water. These cooling towers are a requirement for new plants, but most existing plants resist converting their systems.
“What you’re really talking about is a $1.5 billion hit on the company,” says Jerry Nappi, spokesman for Entergy Nuclear Northeast, owner of Indian Point . He believes talk of cooling towers is “a backdoor attempt by some to shut down Indian Point.”
source: Associated Press
photo: wikimedia commons
Although this article claims nuclear plants are the main culprits, in truth ALL steam plants use cooling water, and the 103 nuclear plants are only a drop in the bucket compared to the 10,000+ ordinary fossil burning steam plants doing the same thing across this country.
In point of fact, modern civilization itself is driven by some variant of James Watt’s condensing steam engine, all over the globe.(Homes have steam boilers in each & every suburban basement).
This civilization would grind to a halt without the steam engine. Fish over-produce eggs, and do not miss any eggs over and above the half of one percent that eventually do hatch.
The only difference is where the extra eggs & small fish get eaten….. in and around the stream in a predatory distribution (in the wild) or just downstream of a steam plant, after leaving the cooling system ( in a civilized setting).
Parents even predate their own offspring! So do not be misled. This is a non-issue!
Thanks Harry for your comment. I hope the article wasn’t too one-sided. Meg
Harry is 100% correct. One more item you glazed over is your statistic stating “19 plants in California…” California has 2 active nuclear stations with only 4 reactors. A simple search on Wikipedia can confirm this data.
The case is NOT about nuclear plants.
The law, if interpreted strictly, would shut down over 500 American power plants of all kinds, plunging us nationally into a great economic downswing.
( Oh… are we already in one?).
Is is worth it to descend to soup lines, starvation in Appalachia, and gang rule in the urban slums, to save the largely imaginary fish cohort supposedly injured by America’s electrical infrastructure?
I think not.