Peru To Power 2 Million Of Its Poorest — By Solar Energy

Peru last week initiated a new program that will provide electricity to more than two million of its poorest residents using solar panels.

machu pichu peru solar
Machu Pichu, Peru on a sunny day.
Photo Credit: szeke / Foter / CC BY-SA
peru
Machu Pichu, Peru.
Photo Credit: titoalfredo / Foter / CC BY-NC-SA

Energy and Mining Minister Jorge Merino said that the program will allow 95% of Peru to have access to electricity by the end of 2016. Currently, approximately 66% of the population has access to electricity.

“This program is aimed at the poorest people, those who lack access to electric lighting and still use oil lamps, spending their own resources to pay for fuels that harm their health,” said Merino.

The first phase of the program, called “The National Photovoltaic Household Electrification Program” was initiated on Monday (July 8) in the Contumaza province, where 1,601 solar panels were installed. These installations will power 126 impoverished communities in the districts of Cupisnique, San Benito, Tantarica, Chilete, Yonan, San Luis, and Contai.

The program plans to install about 12,500 solar (photovoltaic) systems to provide for approximately 500,000 households at an overall cost of about $200 million.

Peru is the third-largest country in South America, with a population over 24 million. It has average solar radiation levels which can reach 5 kWh per m2 a day in the Sierra (foothill of The Andes). Peru is also home to the first major PV installation in Latin America.

This follows Peru’s public commitments to accelerate renewable energy development, as reported here previously by CleanTechnica.

Meanwhile, in the United States, Americans for Prosperity — a political lobbying group founded by billionaire fossil fuel industrialists Charles and David Koch — is currently lobbying the Georgia state legislature to reject a plan requiring Georgia Power, one of the largest energy utilities in the American Southeast, to buy more solar energy.

39 thoughts on “Peru To Power 2 Million Of Its Poorest — By Solar Energy”

  1. Julio Enrique Tito

    Hi, I’m from Perú, I live in Lima. This project will help poorest people in my country using renewable energy, it’s a government program. Sorry for my english.

      1. Julio Enrique Tito

        Hi, there are differents points of view in people that I know or not, in general , some people simply doesn’t know anything about it or don’t mind, and there are people that knows what are the benefits of the photovoltaic system and solar energy. Some ONG are trying make communities get close to solar energy, using it to cook or like heating in houses of andes, I have to say that in Peru all people think that we use only hydroelectric energy, but it’s not true, we use termic energy (gas and oil), there are individual efforts to massify renawable energy, bit to bit, but by now, only it’s considered like a complement…

  2. Julio Enrique Tito

    Hi, I’m from Perú, I live in Lima. This project will help poorest people in my country using renewable energy, it’s a government program. Sorry for my english.

      1. Julio Enrique Tito

        Hi, there are differents points of view in people that I know or not, in general , some people simply doesn’t know anything about it or don’t mind, and there are people that knows what are the benefits of the photovoltaic system and solar energy. Some ONG are trying make communities get close to solar energy, using it to cook or like heating in houses of andes, I have to say that in Peru all people think that we use only hydroelectric energy, but it’s not true, we use termic energy (gas and oil), there are individual efforts to massify renawable energy, bit to bit, but by now, only it’s considered like a complement…

  3. Diego Marquina

    Hi Don, is there any official statement from the Peruvian government or somewhere where I can find more information? How are they planning to provide the electricity, i.e., are the systems going to have batteries? If so, what are they going to do when the battery life runs out (after 5~7 years)?

  4. Diego Marquina

    Hi Don, is there any official statement from the Peruvian government or somewhere where I can find more information? How are they planning to provide the electricity, i.e., are the systems going to have batteries? If so, what are they going to do when the battery life runs out (after 5~7 years)?

  5. what the hell are you talking about with Charles and David Koch, men who have put their lives and fortunes on the line to help many thousands of people? you have no clue.

    1. Hey Bill,

      Thanks for reading and taking the time to engage in this conversation – a most important, historic one — the direction of our energy sources.

      Clueless, however – I am not. The reference in the last paragraph is factual and passes no judgement. The AFP is, indeed, trying to prevent the promotion of solar power in Georgia. I did not make that up.

      Your agitation with the article, it seems, stems from the juxtaposition I have chosen: Peru’s active promotion of solar power, on the one hand, back-to-back with the Koch brothers active resistance to solar promotion in Georgia.

      Many readers besides yourself may also find this comparison uncomfortable — I do also.

      And for the record, I am glad that the Koch brothers donate millions to the New York City ballet, and to cancer research, et al. I am well aware of their philanthropic range.

      But this does not magically erase their concurrent huge investments in climate-altering, environment poisoning fossil fuel mega-projects, in parallel with an aggresive, well-funded effort to quash renewable energy promotion – all of which coming at an historic juncture of atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gas.

      Ignoring that part of their portfolio — THAT would be clueless.

      I am glad you reacted to the admittedly uncomfortable, last-paragraph inclusion of the AFP efforts in Georgia, coming so unexpectedly at the end of an othewise positive story about solar promotion in Peru. You may feel that these two currents don’t belong together.

      That was the point. They don’t.

      1. Not just learning from these incredible articles/links, but seeing the feedback of others– this is very encouraging; Good damage control against potentially paralyzing effects of the hideous facts.

        Public awareness is picking up- none too soon.

    2. wideEyedPupil

      So the Koch brothers earn multiple billions a year from a Climate destroying business and throw a few crumbs to ballet and medical research. So what? It’s like praising drug gang mob bosses for being kind to their pets. These two men are behind millions if not billions of dollars of Climate Change denialism which is propagated by a task force of paid web-trolls and then unpaid ideologically captured volunteers. They fund the Heartland Institute which put up billboards likening Climate scientists to Charles Manson, and would have put up many more likening them to notorious mass murders. When it’s actually the deteriorating climate that is the unfold threat to civilisation and millions of species and whole complete ecosystems.

  6. what the hell are you talking about with Charles and David Koch, men who have put their lives and fortunes on the line to help many thousands of people? you have no clue.

    1. Hey Bill,

      Thanks for reading and taking the time to engage in this conversation – a most important, historic one — the direction of our energy sources.

      Clueless, however – I am not. The reference in the last paragraph is factual and passes no judgement. The AFP is, indeed, trying to prevent the promotion of solar power in Georgia. I did not make that up.

      Your agitation with the article, it seems, stems from the juxtaposition I have chosen: Peru’s active promotion of solar power, on the one hand, back-to-back with the Koch brothers active resistance to solar promotion in Georgia.

      Many readers besides yourself may also find this comparison uncomfortable — I do also.

      And for the record, I am glad that the Koch brothers donate millions to the New York City ballet, and to cancer research, et al. I am well aware of their philanthropic range.

      But this does not magically erase their concurrent huge investments in climate-altering, environment poisoning fossil fuel mega-projects, in parallel with an aggresive, well-funded effort to quash renewable energy promotion – all of which coming at an historic juncture of atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gas.

      Ignoring that part of their portfolio — THAT would be clueless.

      I am glad you reacted to the admittedly uncomfortable, last-paragraph inclusion of the AFP efforts in Georgia, coming so unexpectedly at the end of an othewise positive story about solar promotion in Peru. You may feel that these two currents don’t belong together.

      That was the point. They don’t.

      1. Not just learning from these incredible articles/links, but seeing the feedback of others– this is very encouraging; Good damage control against potentially paralyzing effects of the hideous facts.

        Public awareness is picking up- none too soon.

    1. wideEyedPupil

      These kinds of programs have been rolled out in the poorest parts of India with enormous success. The installers are responsible for the upkeep and do their own maintenance work where required. All free of outside support (bc theres no money for that).

    1. wideEyedPupil

      These kinds of programs have been rolled out in the poorest parts of India with enormous success. The installers are responsible for the upkeep and do their own maintenance work where required. All free of outside support (bc theres no money for that).

  7. Some people on the other side say forcing Georgia utilities to buy solar power will increase everyone’s electric bill for capacity that is not needed. Some people on our side say you build a stronger movement through free choice instead of government force. Maybe these people are wrong. But OMG, Sherrie, didn’t you learn anything in school about the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech?

    1. Solar has been documented to reduce the cost of wholesale electricity in places like Germany and Australia that have a lot of it. Germany, meanwhile, doesn’t have nearly the solar irradiation (sunshine) of Georgia. I wouldn’t worry about it. I’d worry about the nuclear power plant project that is already running over budget, is sure to run over budget much more by the time it’s done, and is going to be much more expensive than solar by the time it’s done. Georgians got totally sc***ed on that one.

    2. I am guilty as charged -though as Ben points out, not liable for imprisonment ! Thanks for motivating me to clarify the intended targets of my wrath: fossil fuel industrialists who ALREADY did their thing, many times over, by deed and certainly by influence.

      To all — especially author Don:

      Truly, as a “typical American” in my thinking in many ways– and yes, i believe that applies// consider that a unifying theme despite serious socio-political divisions—I don’t actually advocate criminalization of “planning” !

      Chalk that previous comment up to how incensed I get thinking of the disregard to the futures of my children, my niece, your
      children… !!

      Anyway, my way to dilute the potential hopelessness that could set in, given the magnitude of what we work against, is to maintain connections such as this one when possible.

      1. The connections are good, Sherrie. I think you and I were both gamed by the last paragraph of the post. It was off the subject and divisive, putting a hard political spin on what was, until then, an uplifting story. Yes, it’s all one world, but come on people, can’t we come together to feel good about what Peru is doing without descending into a squabble about the Koch Brothers?

    3. wideEyedPupil

      Look-up “Merit Order Effect”. essentially by underbidding coal, gas and nuclear in the wholesale market, renewable energy removes the price peaks where the wholesale price of power can go from less than $1MWh to over $1000MWh during times of high demand. In my country, Australia those peaks are summer afternoon peaks when people return from school/work and put the AC on. Renewables stops the utilities price gauging which is where they make much of their profits.

      Also rooftop solarPV is distributed energy so it reduces network upgrade costs. It is said a $1500 AC in Queensland adds $8000 of network costs due to the requirement to make the supply “pipes fatter” (i.e. upgrade load capacity of networks/transformers/poles and wires).

  8. Some people on the other side say forcing Georgia utilities to buy solar power will increase everyone’s electric bill for capacity that is not needed. Some people on our side say you build a stronger movement through free choice instead of government force. Maybe these people are wrong. But OMG, Sherrie, didn’t you learn anything in school about the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech?

    1. You seem to have made a mistake and are commenting on the wrong article. This is about solar in Peru… not Georgia. But since you brought it up. Solar has been documented to reduce the cost of wholesale electricity in places like Germany and Australia that have a lot of it. Germany, meanwhile, doesn’t have nearly the solar irradiation (sunshine) of Georgia. I wouldn’t worry about it. I’d worry about the nuclear power plant project that is already running over budget, is sure to run over budget much more by the time it’s done, and is going to be much more expensive than solar by the time it’s done. Georgians got totally sc***ed on that one.

    2. I am guilty as charged -though as Ben points out, not liable for imprisonment ! Thanks for motivating me to clarify the intended targets of my wrath: fossil fuel industrialists who ALREADY did their thing, many times over, by deed and certainly by influence.

      To all — especially author Don:

      Truly, as a “typical American” in my thinking in many ways– and yes, i believe that applies// consider that a unifying theme despite serious socio-political divisions—I don’t actually advocate criminalization of “planning” !

      Chalk that previous comment up to how incensed I get thinking of the disregard to the futures of my children, my niece, your
      children… !!

      Anyway, my way to dilute the potential hopelessness that could set in, given the magnitude of what we work against, is to maintain connections such as this one when possible.

      1. The connections are good, Sherrie. I think you and I were both gamed by the last paragraph of the post. It was off the subject and divisive, putting a hard political spin on what was, until then, an uplifting story. Yes, it’s all one world, but come on people, can’t we come together to feel good about what Peru is doing without descending into a squabble about the Koch Brothers?

    3. wideEyedPupil

      Look-up “Merit Order Effect”. essentially by underbidding coal, gas and nuclear in the wholesale market, renewable energy removes the price peaks where the wholesale price of power can go from less than $1MWh to over $1000MWh during times of high demand. In my country, Australia those peaks are summer afternoon peaks when people return from school/work and put the AC on. Renewables stops the utilities price gauging which is where they make much of their profits.

      Also rooftop solarPV is distributed energy so it reduces network upgrade costs. It is said a $1500 AC in Queensland adds $8000 of network costs due to the requirement to make the supply “pipes fatter” (i.e. upgrade load capacity of networks/transformers/poles and wires).

  9. Peru? PERU??? But not the US ! Rejecting a plan to buy more solar energy is criminal. Just planning that ought to get jail time, plus monetary damages..

  10. Peru? PERU??? But not the US ! Rejecting a plan to buy more solar energy is criminal. Just planning that ought to get jail time, plus monetary damages..

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top