Science 2927390729_8f1d62f699

Published on September 4th, 2012 | by Joshua S Hill

5

Warming Earth Results in Contrasting Consequences, But Not So Fast

Buffer this pageShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on LinkedInDigg thisEmail this to someone

September 4th, 2012 by

New research by scientists has found that biodiversity on Earth actually increases as the planet warms. However, importantly, this growth is observed in the evolution of new species over millions of years and is most often accompanied by the extinction of other species.

The present trend of accelerated warming is not likely to boost global biodiversity, rather, it is set to destroy it.

Scientists from Universities of York, Glasgow and Leeds analysed fossil and geological records going back 540 million years to discover their findings. Based on an earlier study that looked at biodiversity over the same time period, this new research, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), includes improved data and saw the researchers re-examine patterns of marine invertebrate biodiversity over the last 540 million years.

The researchers found that though there was evidence of increased biodiversity from warming in their study period, it was reliant upon a longer period of time and the extinction of other species.

They do not believe that the current increase in warming is likely to have any positive impact upon the planet’s biodiversity.

“The improved data give us a more secure picture of the impact of warmer temperatures on marine biodiversity and they show that, as before, there is more extinction and origination in warm geological periods,” said Lead author, Dr Peter Mayhew, of the Department of Biology at York. “But, overall, warm climates seem to boost biodiversity in the very long run, rather than reducing it.”

“The previous findings always seemed paradoxical. Ecological studies show that species richness consistently increases towards the Equator, where it is warm, yet the relationship between biodiversity and temperature through time appeared to be the opposite,” Dr Alistair McGowan, of the School of Geographical and Earth Sciences at the University of Glasgow, said. “Our new results reverse these conclusions and bring them into line with the ecological pattern.”

“Science progresses by constantly re-examining conclusions in the light of better data,” added Professor Tim Benton, of the Faculty of Biological Sciences at the University of Leeds. “Our results seem to show that temperature improves biodiversity through time as well as across space. However, they do not suggest that current global warming is good for existing species. Increases in global diversity take millions of years, and in the meantime we expect extinctions to occur.”

Source: The University of York
Image Source: Ryan Somma

Keep up to date with all the most interesting green news on the planet by subscribing to our (free) Planetsave newsletter.




Buffer this pageShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on TumblrShare on LinkedInDigg thisEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, a liberal left-winger, and believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I work as Associate Editor for the Important Media Network and write for CleanTechnica and Planetsave. I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), Amazing Stories, the Stabley Times and Medium.   I love words with a passion, both creating them and reading them.



  • http://DonateDontDump.org Gabri age 15

    Over 96 billion pounds of edible food is dumped in US Landfills. Imagine the positive impact if restaurants, grocery stores, and food corporations donated their surplus or imperfect food to food banks instead of dumping it!

  • Grandpa Tarkin

    It isn’t that warming is good for biodiversity, it’s that glaciations are really, really, bad. A several million year long period of stable cool-but-not-glacial conditions would boost biodiversity just as much as an equal time period of warm conditions.

Back to Top ↑