Global Warming Senator James Inhofe

Published on February 25th, 2011 | by Tom Schueneman

6

Climategate: One More Investigation, Still No Basis for Accusations of Misconduct

February 25th, 2011 by

Another investigation absolves climate scientists and James Inhofe continues his attack on climate science anyway.

Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.) is dogged in his pursuit to expose global warming as the “largest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind” – even if he has to perpetrate a few hoaxes of his own to prove it. You’ve got to admire a man with such determination, to a point. And that point is where his determination abandons reality, which Inhofe’s did many years ago.

All too eager to climb up on the “Climategate” bandwagon, Inhofe called for an investigation by the inspector general of the Commerce Department into “wrongdoing” by climate scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Made for TV

As you’ll remember, Climategate roared onto the headlines only days before the start of the COP15 climate conference in December of 2009. Thousands of emails were stolen from the Climate Research Center of East Anglia University in the UK between leading international climate scientists, including some from the NOAA.

Inhofe running in circles

Of the thousands of hacked emails a handful contained frank discussions that occasionally employed harsh and unprofessional language that revealed an unappealing antagonism toward their antagonizers. It was enough for a great media-blitz wail of accusation – corrupt scientists manipulating data in order to, well, we’re back to Inhofe’s hoax.

Inhofe wasn’t the first to call for an independent investigation to look for scandal. And after numerous independent investigations of everyone involved, on both sides of the Atlantic, there remains no evidence of any manipulated data at the behest of climate scientists.

Including the latest investigation called for by Inhofe.

Survey says

The inspector general reported back to Inhofe this week that scientists for NOAA had not altered data, there was no evidence of any wrongdoing – still.

“In our review of the CRU emails,” the report concluded, “we did not find any evidence that NOAA inappropriately manipulated data comprising the [Global Historical Climatology Network] dataset or failed to adhere to appropriate peer review procedures.”

It makes you wonder who’s perpetrating the hoax.

Read the full report.

Image Credit: Treehugger.com

Keep up to date with all the most interesting green news on the planet by subscribing to our (free) Planetsave newsletter.





Tags: , ,


About the Author

is an online publisher, editor, and freelance writer. He is the founder of GlobalWarmingisReal.com and the History Blog Project, as well as publisher and site director for the HippieMagazine.com. Tom also contributes to numerous environmental blogs, including TriplePundit, Ecopolitology, Sustainablog, and Planetsave.   Tom's work has led him to Europe, Africa, Latin America, Canada, the South Pacific, and across the United States. His home base is San Francisco, California.



  • Pingback: Second Batch of Stolen Emails from UK Climate Research Unit Emerges | Planetsave

  • Pingback: Global Warming & Climate Science Videos | Planetsave

  • http://Web miklos treiber

    another case of cherry picking. read the report your summary is incomplete and ignores the fact that were problems found within the emails.

    • http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com Tom Schueneman

      I know that some really, really, really want to find an international conspiracy from a cabal of nefarious climate scientists to manipulate data to their will – all to create the “hoax” that exists only in Jim Inhofe’s mind. It just isn’t there.
      You can be more specific of the problems to which you refer if you like, but I didn’t cherry pick anything (and the accusation is ironic in so many ways).
      Read my post again (or for the first time) and follow the links – especially the one at the end to the full report.

  • http://Web Ben

    This climate gate story just keeps running. There is a superb piece about it in the BBC Horizon program “Science under attack” which was broadcast recently. IN it they interview the internet journalist responsible for breaking the story about the manipulated data sets. It is quite interesting to see how internet journalism has enabled baseless stories to become accepted truths. Worth a watch if you can get hold of it.

Back to Top ↑