Animals

Published on February 24th, 2011 | by Michael Ricciardi

'Grolar' Bears & 'Narluga' Whales? – Arctic Warming May Promote Hybrid Animals [VIDEO]

In 2006, Arctic hunters shot and killed a strange-looking, white bear. It was strange because the bear had large patches of brown fur in its coat. Subsequent genetic analysis showed that it was in fact a cross between a polar bear and a grizzly bear (making it a “grolar” or “pizzly” bear).

Apparently, more grizzlies  are now moving further north into territory that was once an effective barrier to them due to the cold.

Normally thought of as just “flukes” of Nature or the manipulated outcomes of  zoo breeding experiments (see: ‘Liger’),  examples of such out-breeding in the wild are not very common, but can result from dramatic changes in habitat. But it appears as though inter-breeding is becoming more common; in 2009, a bowhead (Balaena mysticetus) and right whale (Eubalaena spp.) hybrid was spotted, and, more recently, sightings of  spotted seal (Phoca largha) and ribbon seal (Histriophoca fasciata) crosses have been made.

These two examples are biologically noteworthy in another regard: they represent cross-breeding between two different Genera, which is a wider taxonomic grouping than specie (note: the polar and grizzly bears share the same Genus, but are different species).

Off-spring of these couplings are generally fertile and healthy. This is because, in each case, the cross-breeding creatures possess the same number of chromosomes (incompatible chromosome number results in mal-developed gametes), but differ in the types of alleles, or gene variants (making the pairing up of recessive alleles, and thus the emergence of deleterious traits, less likely).

Getting back to the seeming rise in hybrid occurrences…

It is theorized that the breaking up and melting of Arctic sea ice due to warming is the basic driver of this emerging, inter-breeding trend.

As land and water warm they become more habitable for creatures adapted to warmer conditions.  Also: this ‘El Norte’ migration of  land animal species may be buttressed by pressure from shrinking habitat in more southerly climes (e.g., grizzly habitat is diminishing due to several factors, including huge loss of montane pine forest habitat due to decimation from pine beetles, also partly blamed on warming impacts).

A beluga whale

A team of ecologists lead by Brendan Kelly of the National Marine Mammal Laboratory, in Juneau Alaska, has been documenting cases of cross-breeding and out-breeding and they have identified 34  potentially cross-breeding animal pairs — including two distinct (Genera) pairs of porpoises, seals and whales. One of these latter pairings is that between the narwhal (Monodon monoceros) and the beluga whale (Delphinapterus leucas) — yielding the “narluga” whale of this post’s title. Recently, sightings of narlugas have been made in the Bering Sea.

Narwhals "tusking"

The team’s findings and theories were published in the journal Nature, under the title: ‘The Arctic melting pot’, in late 2010.

As climate change and Arctic warming continue, these hybrid animals will likely increase in number.

According to Kelly, the biggest threat in the near term is to already endangered, native species, like the polar bear. Already shrinking in numbers as their habitat shrinks, polar bears will come under increasing pressures from the influx of a competing species*, as well as from the new cross-breeds. Kelly and his team are concerned that, if this hybridization trend continues, the polar bear and other imperiled animals native to the Arctic will soon disappear in the wild.

The inter-breeding trend, if it is indeed a trend, may be an even worse threat to the right whale, whose numbers hover around 200.

But not all scientists in the field agree here. Many ecologists think that hybrids are less fit genetically and others point out the lack of solid evidence that hybridization in the Arctic is in fact increasing. Further, the very idea of a hybrid being somehow a “corruption” of the “pure” species has garnered its share of criticism from fellow scientists.

But perhaps, the concern here is for preservation of the original, or the most long-standing, of creatures…At least until human-induced warming came along. Does  the polar bear deserve some credit or special status here — enough to help protect its existence?

Is preserving the “bloodline” acceptable when it comes to such amazing examples of animal life? Do the same rules of “survival of the fittest” apply when it is willful human industrial activity that is partly to blame?

And it’s not all good news for the hybrids. According to theory, although the initial off-spring of cross-breeds are generally fertile, over time and continuous mating, recessive alleles (present in every genome) will build up in a population, increasing the likelihood of recessive pairing (what is needed for a recessive, non-dominant, trait to appear), resulting in less genetic fitness and decreased chances of long-term survival.

Developing effective survival traits takes time (and perhaps also a stable environment). An accelerating rate of evolutionary pressure/change may simply be too much for some species. Competition from heartier hybrids may likely shrink native populations, forcing more in-breeding, weakening genetic fitness.

And there are emerging signs of maladaptation amongst some cross-breeds: a male narluga was recently spotted off Greenland lacking its spiral tusk (which is important for sexual selection), and, in a German zoo, grizzly-polar hybrids exhibit seal-hunting behavior, but lack the polar bear’s  swimming capability.

Alternatively, these occurrences could be the result of male fighting (over mates), in the case of narlugas, and environmental factors (captive/fed animals), in the case of the grolars.

These could be exceptions, of course. Much more data is needed to validate these theories. But, if increasing numbers of these hybrids are being driven by accelerated Climate Change/Arctic Warming, then we have a cautionary lesson: that the speeding up evolutionary pressures, the forcing of animals into rapid adaptive modes, may not produce biologically favorable outcomes.

Quoting Kelly from an interview with Live Science: “”This change is happening so rapidly that it doesn’t bode well for adaptive responses.”

Watch a collaged video about the grizzly-polar hybrid (warning: graphics are in Japanese and some footage may be upsetting to some viewers; article continues below):

As the Arctic warms, and the great ice barrier to cross-breeding melts away, hybrids will no doubt grow more common; in time, will these hybrids also become endangered? The Endangered Species Act (ESA), as it is currently framed, makes no mention of protections for hybrids.

* One criticism here is the claim that grizzly distribution is shifting (northward) in response to the climate, when in fact grizzly and polar bear domains over-lap considerably and have for thousands of years.

Check out the original Planetsave post on this topic by Josh S. Hill: Hybridization Good and Bad for Arctic Mammals

Some source material for this article came from the msnbc.com article ‘Hybrid polar-grizzly bear a sign of Arctic’s future? by Janelle Weaver

Top Photo: Canadian Wildlife Service via AP; This polar bear was legally hunted by Jim Martell, left, in 2006 in Canada’s Northwest Territory. DNA tests later showed the bear had a polar bear for a mother and a grizzly bear for a father.

Beluga Whale Photo: Eva Hejda http://fotos.naturspot.de/

Polar Bear Photo: Alan D, Wilson ; cc – by – sa 3.0


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Michael Ricciardi is a well-published writer of science/nature/technology articles as well as essays, poetry and short fiction. Michael has interviewed dozen of scientists from many scientific fields, including Brain Greene, Paul Steinhardt, Arthur Shapiro, and Nobel Laureate Ilya Progogine (deceased). Michael was trained as a naturalist and taught natural science on Cape Cod, Mass. from 1986-1991. His first arts grant was for production of the environmental (video) documentary 'The Jones River - A Natural History', 1987-88 (Kingston, Mass.). Michael is an award winning, internationally screened video artist. Two of his more recent short videos; 'A Time of Water Bountiful' and 'My Name is HAM' (an "imagined memoir" about the first chimp in space), and several other short videos, can be viewed on his website (http://www.chaosmosis.net). He is also the author of the ebook 'Zombies, E.T's, and The Super Entity - A Selection of Most Stimulating Articles' and for Kindle: Artful Survival ~ Creative Options for Chaotic Times



Back to Top ↑