Comments on: 7 Myths about Climate Change Science [& FUN VIDEOS]

By: Curry Lost in Denial (& Global Warming Still = More Snow) | Planetsave

Curry Lost in Denial (& Global Warming Still = More Snow) | Planetsave — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:39:12 +0000

[...] 7 Myths about Climate Change Science (#1 & 2) [...]

By: One More Time, Does the Cold in the Northeast & Europe Disprove Global Warming? Heck No – Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news

Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:37:19 +0000

[...] Also, as a clear note, global warming means more water evaporates and more precipitation occurs (in the summer and winter). In the winter, that means more snow. [...]

By: Global Cooling Myth Dies Again – Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news

Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:02:05 +0000

[...] Stories: 1. 7 Myths about Climate Change Science [& FUN VIDEOS] 2. Addressing “Global Cooling” 3. Climate Science in 1956 [...]

By: Climate Science in 1956 [VIDEO] – Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news

Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:30:26 +0000

[...] Stories: 1. 7 Myths about Climate Change Science [& FUN VIDEOS] 2. Addressing “Global Cooling” 3. Global Cooling Myth Dies [...]

By: Sustainability and Living Green Links | Good Cheer Blog Spot

Sustainability and Living Green Links | Good Cheer Blog Spot — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:00:34 +0000

[...] the last piece we have Zachary Shahan talking about 7 Myths about Climate Change Science. This Platesave post has some very good videos. You have Rachel Madow and the Science Guy and two [...]

By: iPhone App for Telling a Climate Skeptic Their Wrong : CleanTechnica

iPhone App for Telling a Climate Skeptic Their Wrong : CleanTechnica — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:07:11 +0000

[...] arguments as well as the science-based counterarguments to those (since we are all tired of the misinformed myths about climate science but normally can’t cite scientific articles and data off the top of our [...]

By: 7 Myths about Climate Change Science [& FUN VIDEOS]

7 Myths about Climate Change Science [& FUN VIDEOS] — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:24:43 +0000

[...] Read more of this story » [...]

By: Humpty Smith

Humpty Smith — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:05:16 +0000

As a fan of the scientific method, wouldn’t you support the idea that all of this controversy should be examined to see how it fits in with the current climate model? Your point is that ignorance and political motivations have allowed many people to be misled. A point that you make while doing the exact same thing. If “most” agree it does not seem very scientific. After all, “most” scientists have agreed throughout history on their current understanding of the world we live in only to be dissuaded later. Our “scientific” understanding in the 1950′s was scoffed at by the 1970′s, and that understanding was scoffed at in the 1990′s, which was in turn scoffed at today. In fact, at no point in history, has “science” had a complete understanding of just about anything or else we would 1) not be conducting further research and 2) not be required to alter previous understandings every few years. Lets all put political mischief and special interest behind us, or you are no better than those you discredit. Scare tactics are the domain of the ignorant.

By: How to Deal with Environmental Concern « lightngreen

How to Deal with Environmental Concern « lightngreen — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:21:48 +0000

[...] Caring about the environment is a good thing. However, sometimes the concern can get overwhelming. How do we deal with the great environmental collapse humans are creating? How do we deal with the oncoming global tidal wave of climate change, especially when the mainstream media continues to portray the science as questionable when it is not? [...]

By: charles

charles — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:16:49 +0000

This subject is just like many in the past. There is two side to the story. And, both sides seem have an agenda that they are willing to force onto the people. The fact is that the climate of the Earth changes all the time and im not talking about changes in seasons. Lets face it the planet has been much warmer and cooler in the past before cars, factories, etc. and even before humans. However, this does not mean that humans are not having an impact. I do feel that people do need to take notice of how and what is being consumed. Then, as people pay attention to how much energy they use and other factors then return to a more natural way of living the problems will correct themselves. Nevertheless, this was an excellent post with lots of good info. Thanks for the effort.

By: 7 Myths about Climate Change Science [& FUN VIDEOS] « Green Commentaries Around the Web

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:05:51 +0000

[...] Read more of this story » [...]

By: Stuart Bramhall

Stuart Bramhall — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:24:18 +0000

Great post. I really like the way you unpack the latest oil industry/mainstream media disinformation. I think the ultimate goal of this ridculous debate is to make people through up their hands and decide it is too complicated for ordinary people to understand. Unfortunately it seems quite a successful strategy. People withdraw from trying to do anything and go back to watching TV. When I run across people who are taken in by climate change sceptism. I use the probability argument:
1. we all agree global temperatures and extreme weather events are increasing.
2. climate scientists admit there may be some other cause than human activity.
3. they have calculated the odds that it is caused by something else – but this probability is so extremely low it is virtually impossible.
People here in New Zealand are great gamblers (on horse and dog races) and they readily understand odds and probability.