Dirty Energy & Fuel no image

Published on May 8th, 2009 | by Jeff Pecaro

4

Obama Administration Won’t Save Polar Bear from Bush’s Rule Change

The Obama administration’s Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, announced today that he won’t be changing George W. Bush’s rule that global factors, such as climate change, cannot be considered in analyzing the polar bear’s survival.

[social_buttons]

The rule, instituted in the last months of Bush’s presidency, prohibit the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and National Marine Fisheries services from considering whether practices outside the polar bear’s territory are affecting its chances for survival.

This severely limits the environmental agencies’ ability to regulate how the effects of climate change are impacting the polar bear and its habitat. Congress passed legislation on March 10th that specifically allowed Salazar to rescind this rule-change by the Bush administration, but he has decided today to allow the deadline for that rule change to pass.

The inclusion of climate change in the protections of the Endangered Species Act presents a nightmare scenario for many of the major players in American industry, who could be forced by federal law to undergo costly and expansive changes if science could provide a causal link between their projects or proposals and the impending extinction of such a popular and charismatic species.

The Endangered Species Act was intended to protect animals at risk of extinction, and their habitats, from danger as a “consequence of economic growth and development untempered by adequate concern and conservation.” Bush’s rule, limiting the protections available to a species to actions taken in that animal’s home-range, legally removes the EPA’s ability to hold American industry responsible for how their actions are affecting the arctic.

One of the ESA’s most powerful tools is its effect on the approval of new projects, such as power plants, factories, and housing developments. Environmental groups have successfully brought suit to stop or alter a number of projects that threatened habitats critical to a species’ survival, using the Act for legal justification.

While it may protect American industry from making costly changes, at least for the time being, it seems to indicate that Salazar’s agency and Obama’s government are not ready to accept responsibility for how climate change that is threatening the polar bear.

Photo Credit: Just Being Myself on Flickr under Creative Commons license.





About the Author



  • michelle

    i think it’s important to be involved!!!!! to save

  • snowmaneasy

    Polar Bears in danger from US climate laws….
    Alaskan Wildlife authorities state that the Alaskan Polar Bears are abundant, stable and unthreatened by direct human activity. What this is all about is that the climate models predict that in the future (say around 2030 or so..)the ice MAY retreat and then the bears will be threatened..so in actual fact it is all about a computer model prediction since at the moment (right now !!) the ice in the arctic appears to be recovering, this can be seen at

    http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm

    This will show that at the moment the ice coverage in the arctic is greater than it has been for over 6 years. Hopefully the summer coverage will also be better than the preceding years…so logically it is not a good idea to bring climate change into the Endangered Species Act…IMHO

  • Pingback: Natural Remedies for Infant Acid Reflux | Child Products

  • http://www.biologicaldiversity.org climatewarrior

    Salazar’s decision to adopt Bush’s illogical and illegal rule reducing protections for polar bears is extremely disappointing. Ask the Obama administration to reconsider by signing the online petition http://www.savethepolarbear.org

Back to Top ↑