At first, when PETA offered Michael Vick a chance to star in a PSA against dog fighting, he jumped at the opportunity, probably hoping it would help clear his name.
But now, PETA is having second thoughts — saying they want him to take psychological tests and receive an MRI to show he’s physically capable of having compassion for animals — party because of Vick’s performance in a handwritten test on animal empathy. Of course, they’ve kindly released his answers to the public.
>> See also: In Poor Economy, PETA Buying Stock in Meat-Heavy Restaurants
>> and BREAKING: NBC Rejects Another PETA Super Bowl Ad for Being Too Hot [video]
Some are downright hilarious (“Chickens have an uncanny ability to think and are very agile. They are very athletic to me.”) while others actually make me feel bad for the guy (“Practice what you preech + don’t condone in hyp.”).
Based on the test alone, it’s unclear whether Vick actually is “reformed,” so I don’t blame PETA for holding off on the PSA deal. His answers sound much like a 6th grade student rephrasing sentences from a text book for a take-home essay. He’s just saying what they wanted to hear.
Vick already has a universal bad rap — dog fighting isn’t a controversial topic, it’s already been decided to be unethical by the vast majority of society. There’s really no reason for PETA to even try to help him as he’s the only one who would benefit from this situation.
What do you think? Should PETA even bother fighting this battle? Check out the rest of the test here (pdf).
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
Alex Felsinger
Alex is primarily concerned with animal welfare, wildlife conservation, and environmental justice. As a freelance writer in San Francisco, he leads a deliberately simplistic and thrifty lifestyle, yet still can’t help gawking at the newest green gadgets and zero-emission concept cars.
55 Responses to Michael Vick Scores 73.5% on PETA’s Animal Empathy Test
Click on a tab to select how you'd like to leave your comment
I hate peta…They are pickers and chosers which make their efforts to protect animals pointless…I will never support an organization that discriminates against certain backgrounds of people.The HSUS, ASPCA,and IFAW keep up the good work
Thank God for PETA. If not for them, the HSUS, ASPCA, IFAW, etc. would have NONE of their current clout, and they all know it. Keep up the good fight, PETA.
Should I take it at its face value, and if so, then why? ,
I hate peta…They are pickers and chosers which make their efforts to protect animals pointless…I will never support an organization that discriminates against certain backgrounds of people…I see people on T.V kill animals for sport everyday yet, I dont see anyone protesting these TV networks for animal rights..PETA is a waste of tax dollars, especially when they pick and chose certain animals they want to protect…Somebody needs to pull the plug on that operation…Seems like it is ran by a bunch of wackos…
PETA is an abomination to effective efforts for improving animals’ rights.