Popular US Farm Chemical = Death to Frogs

Print Friendly

A new report shows that atrazine, the second-most widely used agricultural herbicide in America, poses a serious threat to amphibians.

[social_buttons]For a long time now, I’ve been hearing about the worrisome disappearance of amphibians around the world.  One third of amphibian populations on Planet Earth are threatened with extinction.  A new study finds that atrazine, the second most widely used farm herbicide in the country, is partly responsible for this decline.

The weed killer allows massive concentrations of flatworms to live and thrive in amphibians’ ponds.  In water where atrazine was present, the study showed that young frogs produced only one-half to one-seventh as many parasite-clearing immune cells as frogs in atrazine-free water.  In these circumstances, their ability to fight off infections from the increasing number of flatworms was jeopardized.  To make things worse, phosphate runoff entering into the same body of water has been shown to increase atrazine’s toxicity.

Flatworm infections can lead to limb deformities in frogs, and severe infections can lead to death. High rates of these infections began showing up in frogs across the nation in the mid-1990s. The new study suggests that one reason for this is because of atrazine’s quick rise in popularity amongst U.S farmers around that time.

“What really impressed me about the new work,” offered Tyrone Hayes of the University of California, Berkeley, “is that it looked at a huge number of factors describing a complex environment and asked which of these 240 things contributes [to flatworm infections in frogs]. And the most important one turned out to be atrazine.”

Where did this chemical come from and how do we replace it with something less harmful?

Syngenta, a self-labeled “world-leading agribusiness committed to sustainable agriculture,” registered atrazine for U.S. use and remains a leading manufacturer of the toxic chemical.  I’ve already contacted their “health, safety and environment” department, telling them to find a better solution than atrazine.  I wonder if flooding Syngenta’s e-mail box will help get the message across.

Source:  Science News

Photo: Wikimedia Commons



Meg Hamill (28 Posts)

Meg Hamill has been working in the environmental non-profit field in Northern California for the past six years. She currently works as a naturalist for LandPaths (in partnership with the Open Space District) in Santa Rosa California. She teaches poetry in the public school through California Poets in the Schools (CPITS) and has traveled extensively throughout South and Central America, picking up Spanish along the way. In 1999 she completed a thru-hike of the Appalachian Trail. Meg holds an MFA in Creative Writing and has published two books of political/environmental poetry. Read more, buy books and e-mail Meg at www.meghamill.com.


  • http://www.applefarmservice.com/products.htm Ted

    Very interesting. I have also read studies about roundup and its use and effects relating to the farming community.

    • Zach

      yeah, and also the soil…

  • http://msphillyorganic.com Msphillyorganic

    Thank you for the link to Syngenta.

    For more detail on this study, please read this National Public Radio piece: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=96282292 For those not interested in following the link, the information below is excerpted from the story.

    There has been one study (not yet reproduced) that shows atrazine interferes with frog reproduction. Also atrazine allows snails that carry the tapeworms to flourish.

    Some of the tanks were dosed with a bit of atrazine. It turned out the chemical set off an ecological chain reaction — it killed algae floating in the water. But algae attached to the bottom of the tank survived. In fact, those algae prospered, because they were getting more sunlight.

    “There was more food for the snails and, as a result, there were many more snails in those tanks,” Rohr says.

    Four times more snails, in fact. And more snails means sicker frogs, because snails carry those flatworm parasites.

    Rohr and his colleagues noticed something else. In the tanks with atrazine, the number of frogs infected with parasites jumped even more drastically than they expected based on the increasing snail population. Rohr says this hints that atrazine may also damage the frogs’ immune system so they can’t fight off the parasites.

  • Craig

    Atrazine is an herbicide, not a pesticide. Its also quite commonly used on St. Augustine grass lawns, since it does not affect the grass but does other weeds. Its soluble in water and thus often leaches through lawns and fields into the groundwater.

  • Jack Mason

    Wow dude, I think you hit the nail right on the head.

    Jiff
    http://www.online-anonymity.kr.tc

  • Jaffee Ryder

    This information has been known for years. Please also see Diane Forsen’s paper on this topic.

  • http://gas2.org Clayton B. Cornell

    This history of this chemical and the people involved is really interesting. If you aren’t familiar with Tyron Hayes, look him up. He’s gotten in trouble before for his research, namely the this-isn’t-toxic-alone-but-is-in-combination-with-other-commonly-used-pesticides study. It seems to be a pretty classic case of mega-corporation vs. flawed US regulation (namely risk assessment and evaluation criteria) vs. one person trying to really call them all out with hard data.